| Phoenix Multifamily
Market
 |
|
Tenge
|
|
The Phoenix multifamily market has experienced an increase
in vacancy rates over the past several years. This year, however,
vacancy should begin to decrease as new apartment construction
slows and job growth continues to rise. Construction dropped
28 percent from 2002 to 2003, and is expected to fall 43 percent
from 2003 to 2004, with only 2,500 units coming on line, says
Jerry Tenge, senior vice president of the multi-housing investment
group at Grubb & Ellis.
As a result, the Phoenix metropolitan statistical area registered
a 10.37 percent average vacancy rate for stabilized projects
as of second quarter 2003. This represents a 0.64 percent increase
over first quarter 2003 and a 1 percent increase since the second
quarter of 2002. What we have seen is a reduction of concessions
in the marketplace from 2 or 3 months to 1 or 2 months [of free
rent], says Tenge. So the physical vacancy may not
be changing, but the economic vacancy factor is improving and
expectations are high for that trend to continue with students
returning for the third quarter. Overall, however, the
multifamily market remains unwelcoming to most developers. There
are no new developers currently entering the Phoenix market,
and Post, Legacy and JPI are leaving the multifamily market.
Existing developers include Fairfield, Mark Taylor, Alliance,
Spanos and Trammell Crow Company.
While the apartment market is suffering, there is an upswing
in condominium development in Phoenix. [The condo developer]
is competing for multifamily zoned sites and is very aggressive,
says Tenge. Usually the condo developer cannot compete
because he cannot develop at the high density of 18 dwelling
units per acre. But he has narrowed the gap from 10 to 12 dwelling
units per acre to 14 to 15 dwelling units per acre. Land
prices right now range from $3 to $5 per square foot for B grade
apartment sites and $30 to $50 per square foot for high-end
condo sites. According to Tenge, one reason for the appeal of
condos is the fact that Phoenix has become a more transient
city. Some developers taking advantage of the market are D.R.
Horton, Pulte, Statesman, Monterey Homes and Towne Realty.
The multifamily development occurring in the Phoenix area is
primarily located on the peripheral edge of the city. Phoenix
is a city with a center building outward with only two areas
of restriction, says Tenge. Because of two Indian
reservations, development cannot go south of Phoenix or east
of Scottsdale. Of the submarkets surrounding Phoenix,
Scottsdale seems to be one of the more lucrative spots. [Scottsdale]
is almost landlocked, which makes its future seem very bright,
says Tenge. He also adds that Tempe and Chandler have good potential
because of the number of new jobs that have been created in
that area.
The typical apartment development that is being constructed
in Phoenix is either a two-story, frame and stucco construction
or a three-story building with about 18 units per acre, covered
parking and possibly some garages. The average unit size is
850 square feet with a washer and dryer in every unit, says
Tenge. Across all apartment types, rental rates have been
flat for 3 years, says Tenge. In 2001, the average rent
for Class A properties was $815; in 2002, it was $815; and in
2003, rent averaged $816, says Tenge. For Class B and C properties,
rents were $580 in 2001, $580 in 2002 and $579 in 2003.
However, the multifamily market should begin to improve as Phoenix
experiences strong job growth 40,000 projected jobs for
2003 and 69,000 new jobs for 2004. But the best help for the
apartment market is a rising interest rate, according to Tenge.
The increase in interest rates would make the gap between
entry-level housing and apartment rental larger, making it more
difficult for renters to leave rental housing, says Tenge.
The best time to buy in Phoenix will be in 2004 when absorption
should be better and the slowdown in new developments will be
at an all-time low.
©2003 France Publications, Inc. Duplication
or reproduction of this article not permitted without authorization
from France Publications, Inc. For information on reprints
of this article contact Barbara
Sherer at (630) 554-6054.
|